City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant raises numerous propositions of law in its appeals. Two of those are constitutional challenges. The remaining propositions raised by appellant primarily challenge the reasonableness and lawfulness of the rates established by the commission and the calculation of expenses used by the commission when it determined those rates.
I
In its first proposition of law the city contends that the severance of its case from the rate cases concerning the rest of the area serviced by the gas company denied the city due process of law and a fair hearing in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- General Motors Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Franklin County Welfare Rights Organization v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.