Legal Opinion
Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1994No. 1993-1710PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 244.] OFFICE OF CONSUMERS' COUNSEL, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,
1994-Ohio-469.] Public Utilities Commission—Application for rate increase by small telephone company—R.C. 4927.04(B) and the commission's alternative regulations permit the commission to set small company rates without a hearing— Ratepayers have right to protect interest they may have in just and reasonable rates under R.C. 4905.22 by filing a complaint under R.C.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Complaint of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Bays v. Indus. Comm., Ohio, Unpublished Decision (6-8-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Application of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026