Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 13, 1967No. 127PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The question here is whether the Federal Power Commission, in the course of determining just and reasonable rates for United Gas Pipé Line Company (United) under .§ 4 (e) of the Natural Gas Act, 52 Stat. 822, 15 U. S. C. § 717c (e), made a proper allowance for federal income taxes in calculating the company’s cost of service. United claimed that in determining the cost of service its al-lowánce for federal income taxes should be at the full 52% rate, or $12,751,454, for the test year. The Commission disagreed because United w;as a member of an affiliated group which during the five-year…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- California v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Suburban Utility Corp. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.