Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.
The commission’s Order on Rehearing, which disallowed charitable contributions, was based on the “belief that the court in the Cleveland case, supra, had determined as a matter of law that a company’s charitable donations were not a ‘cost to the utility of rendering the public utility service’ within the meaning of that phrase as employed in Section 4909.15(A)(4) Revised Code.”
Appellants and the amici argue that the utilities have a right to present evidence to the commission on the question of whether charitable contributions provide a direct, primary benefit to their customers. Furthermore,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001