Legal Opinion
George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1980No. Civ. 21097PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
George Arakelian Farms, Inc. (Arakelian or petitioner) seeks statutory review (Lab. Code, § 1160.8) of a decision of the *263Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) determining that petitioner committed three unfair labor practices and of Board’s order based thereon. (All statutory references will be to the Labor Code unless otherwise specified.)
Arakelian is an agricultural employer (§ 1140.4, subd. (c)) subject to the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (§ 1140 et seq. [hereafter ALRA]). It is a California corporation engaged in the growing, harvesting and marketing of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Superior Farming Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Laflin & Laflin v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR REL. BD.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.