Legal Opinion
Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1980No. Civ. 3670PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Statement of the Case
Petitioner, Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. (Jasmine), an agricultural employer, seeks review of a final order of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Board) finding Jasmine guilty of unfair labor practices and ordering certain remedies.
The Board found that during an organizing campaign preceding an anticipated representational election Jasmine had (1) discriminated against the United Farm Workers (UFW) and in favor of the Teamsters Union in enforcing a no-solicitation policy; (2) solicited employees to sign Teamster authorization cards; and (3) made threats…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nish Noroian Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.California Supreme Court · 1984
- County of San Diego v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bertuccio v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cardinal Distributing Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.