Legal Opinion
George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1986No. E002924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Petitioner was found by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) to have committed unfair labor practices in unilaterally changing wages and discontinuing a fuel allowance. Petitioner sought review and we issued an order to show cause.
I
Procedural History
George Arakelian Farms, Inc. (Arakelian) is a corporation engaged in growing lettuce in the Blythe area of the Palo Verde Valley and is subject to the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (the Act). In December 1976, a representation election was conducted among Arakelian’s agricultural employees. The United Farm…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Highland Ranch v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bertuccio v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Imperial County Department of Social Services v. Marianne G.California Court of Appeal · 2005