Legal Opinion
Laflin & Laflin v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR REL. BD.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1985No. Civ. 20242PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Laflin & Laflin aka Laflin Date Gardens (petitioner or Laflin) seeks statutory review of a final order of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) determining that petitioner committed an unfair labor practice by partially failing to comply with ALRB’s “pre-petition employee list” regulation (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 8, §§ 20910 and 20310, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and ordering petitioner to take specified affirmative action. (All statutory references are to sections of the Labor Code unless otherwise specified; the Agricultural Labor Relations Act as codified will be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sunnyside Nurseries, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- William Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018