Legal Opinion
Gorman v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1987No. CV 86 0102-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Dorothy Gorman’s (Gorman) suit against the City of Phoenix (Phoenix) was dismissed for failure to comply with Uniform Rule V(e), Ariz.Unif.R.P.Super. Ct., 17A A.R.S. 1 The trial court denied Gorman’s motion to set aside the dismissal pursuant to Rule 60(c)(6), Ariz.R.Civ.P., 16 A.R.S. 2 The court of appeals affirmed the trial court under both Rule 60(c)(1) and (c)(6). Gorman v. City of Phoenix, No. 1 CA-CIV 8237 (Ariz.Ct.App. Jan. 16, 1986) (memorandum decision). Both courts based their decisions on our recent opinion in Bickerstaff v. Denny’s Restaurant,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Jepson v. NewArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. O'TooleArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Boston v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- M & M Auto Storage Pool, Inc. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.