Legal Opinion

Panzino v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2000No. CV-99-0193-PRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue presented is whether Arizona should adopt the positive misconduct rule, which permits a client whose attorney has abandoned him or her to obtain relief from a judgment by invoking Rule 60(c)(6) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. We decline to adopt the rule because doing so would require us to abandon our long-standing interpretation of Rule 60(c) and to overturn established principles of law.

I

¶ 2 On January 18, 1993, a car driven by Denise Karlin struck Laura Panzino as she walked in a street to avoid rainwater ponding in her path. Panzino,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Waifersong, Ltd. Inc. v. Classic Music Vending Harry H. Krouskoupf, Sr. Harry H. Krouskoupf, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. United States v. 7108 West Grand Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, Feliberto Flores and Isabellita Flores, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Glaze v. LarsenArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Tilley v. DelciCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Bed Mart, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Rogone v. CorreiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API