Legal Opinion

Boston v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 2003No. 96,470PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

¶ 1 This case involves a trial court’s dismissal of an action based upon its determination that the action was not diligently prosecuted by Plaintiffs. The primary issue on certiorari is the difference between dismissing an action pursuant to 12 O.S.2001 § 1083, and dismissing an action in the exercise of a trial court’s inherent power as set forth in the first two sentences of Rule 9(b) of the Rules for District Courts. The trial court used both the statute and the Rule as authority for dismissing the action. Because § 1083 does not apply in this case, and because the trial court erroneously…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Cornett v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Brown v. K-MAC EnterprisesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Bicknell v. RandolphCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API