Legal Opinion

Webb v. Erickson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1982No. 15900-PRPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

■ At issue is whether the trial court erred in vacating a default judgment entered in favor of Appellant Webb and against Appellee Bates, a garnishee-defendant. The court of appeals held that the trial court’s action was an abuse of discretion and reversed. Webb v. Erickson, 134 Ariz. 191, 655 P.2d 15 (App.1981). Bates petitioned this court for review. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and Rule 23, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

On August 5, 1975, appellant Webb obtained a default judgment against Carl and Nancy Erickson in the amount…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cockerham v. ZikratchArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Queen City Electrical Supply Co. v. Soltis Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. United Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pamela A. Loftin v. James K. Rush, United States of America, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API