Legal Opinion
Jepson v. New
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1990No. CV-89-0058-PR, CV-89-0106-PRPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LACAGNINA, Judge.
John Flynn’s personal injury action was dismissed for lack of prosecution after the trial court denied his motion to continue the • case on the court’s inactive calendar under Uniform Rule V(e), Ariz.Uni.R.P.Super.Ct., 17B A.R.S. Additionally, the trial court denied his request for relief under Ariz.R. Civ.P. 60(c), 16 A.R.S., and A.R.S. § 12-504, this state’s savings statute, and the court of appeals affirmed. Flynn v. Comoyer-Hedrick Architects & Planners, Inc., 160 Ariz. 187, 772 P.2d 10 (App.1989).
Timothy and Deborah Jepson’s personal injury action was also dismissed for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Maher v. UrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Mission Insurance v. Cash, Sullivan & CrossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Curtis v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Porter v. SpaderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.