Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc., 222 Or App 230, 193 P3d 96 (2008), we designated defendant as the prevailing party on appeal and allowed it costs and disbursements. Notwithstanding that designation, plaintiff petitioned for attorney fees and costs, which defendant has opposed. Defendant also submitted a statement of costs and disbursements. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that we erred in designating defendant as the prevailing party. Accordingly, we designate plaintiff as the prevailing party, award him attorney fees and costs, and deny defendant’s statement of costs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Dobie v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Robinowitz v. PozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamlin v. HAMPTON LUMBER MILLS, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.