Legal Opinion

Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 2016No. 082260; A151032PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendants Bloedel Construction Co. and Rodger Bloedel (collectively, the Bloedel defendants) seek reconsideration of our decision in Village at North Pointe Condo. Assn. v. Bloedel Constr., 278 Or App 354, 374 P3d 978 (2016) (Village), contending that plaintiff should not have been designated as the prevailing party on appeal and contending that their cross-appeal should have been dismissed as moot with no prevailing party.1 Plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of our opinion, the merits of which we reject without discussion. For the reasons that follow, we allow reconsideration based on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. HAMPTON LUMBER MILLS, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Lincoln County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Dockins v. State Farm Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Makarios-Oregon, LLC v. Ross Dress-For-Less, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Makarios-Oregon, LLC v. Ross Dress-For-Less, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. SkotlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API