Robinowitz v. Pozzi
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiff appeals from summary judgments 1 for defendants 2 on his quantum meruit and foreclosure of attorney’s lien claims and on defendants’ counterclaim for attorney fees. We affirm in all respects but one.
Plaintiff, an attorney, represented defendant Olson on a contingent fee basis in a personal injury claim against a shipowner. He filed a lawsuit in federal district court, took depositions, prepared for trial and unsuccessfully opposed the shipowner’s motion for summary judgment. After judgment was entered against Olson, plaintiff advised Olson that the court’s decision was erroneous,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Jaqua v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Willamette Production Credit Ass'n v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Rohr v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Milliken & Michaels v. Netterville LumberMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.