Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 2009No. 060505243, A135637PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff (English) seeks reconsideration of our decision in English v. Multnomah County, 229 Or App 15, 209 P3d 831 (2009), contending that defendant Multnomah County (the county) should not have been designated as the prevailing party on appeal. For the reasons that follow, we grant reconsideration and adhere to our former opinion and disposition but conclude that we erred in designating the county as the prevailing party. Accordingly, we designate English as the prevailing party on appeal.

English, a landowner who obtained a judgment for $1,150,000 in just compensation pursuant to Measure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Bush v. City of PrinevilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API