Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1936No. Civ. No. 9693PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this cause there are two appeals, taken by the defendant—one from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the other from the judgment. They were taken separately, but by stipulation and order they have been submitted upon one transcript and a single set of briefs.

*485On its appeal from the order it is urged by appellant that its motion ought to have been granted because plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the two-year provision of the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 339, subd. 1) as being one not founded upon an instrument of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Born v. CastleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Milovich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API