Legal Opinion

Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. L. A. No. 4237. Department OnePublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The purpose of the action was to recover damages from the defendant,-a trust company, for its alleged disregard of certain instructions under which there had been deposited with it, as escrow-holder, a check for two thousand dollars and three promissory notes. The appellant contends that the evidence does not support the findings upon which the court gave its judgment against him.

The respondent makes a preliminary objection to the consideration of the bill of exceptions upon the ground that the proposed bill was not served in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Spaziani v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Rianda v. San Benito Title Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Robinson v. HilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API