Yeung v. Soos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
Defendant and appellant Emery Soos appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a judgment following his default in this quiet title action brought by plaintiffs and respondents Timothy and Chuanpit Yeung. Defendant contends a default judgment in a quiet title action is void. We conclude the trial court erred when it entered a quiet title judgment utilizing normal default prove-up procedures, without an evidentiary hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 764.010.) However, we further conclude the judgment was not void and the motion to vacate was therefore untimely. We reject *579defe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Winter v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Harbour Vista v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Nickell v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- David S. Karton, a Law Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Harbour Vista v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.