Legal Opinion
Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1994No. E011158PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
A plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his action against two defendants. We affirm.
Procedural Background
In March of 1987, plaintiff Jim Dill filed a complaint seeking the recovery of damages for personal injuries for which the defendants were allegedly liable under theories of negligence and strict liability. Among the defendants named were Berquist Construction Company and Strata America (hereinafter, Berquist and Strata, respectively, and collectively defendants).
On June 7, 1988, Dill mailed a copy of the summons, complaint, and statement of damages (Code Civ.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ellard v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.