Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 2008No. D049623PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Cardinal Health 301, Inc. (Cardinal), developed the MedStation 2000, a machine used by hospitals to supply patient medication to medical personnel. Defendants Tyco Electronics Corporation (Tyco) and Thomas & Betts Corporation (T&B) manufactured certain electrical parts for the MedStation, known as spring probe connectors. After Cardinal sold numerous MedStations to hospitals, the machines did not always work properly, and testing showed the problems could be attributed to defects in the spring probe connector.

Cardinal then sued Tyco and T&B claiming the…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Alvarez v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API