Legal Opinion

Harbour Vista v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 2011No. G044357PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal requires us to interpret the statute governing judgments in quiet title actions. The statutory language is about as straightforward as such language ever gets: “The court shall not enter judgment by default. . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 764.010.) Entry of a default judgment against appellant HSBC Mortgage Services Inc., and in favor of respondent Harbour Vista, LLC, in a quiet title action was error.

*1500We therefore reverse. After examining the relevant statutes, we conclude the court did not have the authority to enter a default judgment in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Mediterranean Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nickell v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pyle, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Lennar Homes of California, Inc. v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. McGurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API