Legal Opinion
Heidary v. Yadollahi
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 2002No. G026035PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
Farzad Yadollahi and Fariborz Biyazaei appeal from the denial of their motion to set aside a $943,000 default judgment entered against them jointly on a cross-complaint. Appellants contend the judgment is void because their default was improperly based upon their failure to appear at a trial for which they were given no notice. They also point out that the judgment subsequently entered on the default is rather shockingly out of sync with the distinct damages alleged against each of them in the operative complaint. We agree.
Even assuming appellants had been given proper…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Rochin v. Pat Johnson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Lee v. AnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.