Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 24, 1984No. CV-81-68-GFPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff, GUY MITCHELL, seeks redress for injuries he received while acting in the course of his employment with the defendant Brinkerhoff-Signal, Inc. (hereinafter “Brinkerhoff”). While working on an oil well drilling rig, Mitchell’s legs were mangled by a chain which had become entangled in the unguarded portion of either the rotary table or the kelly bushing of the drilling rig. Mitchell seeks to impose liability upon numerous defendants, ranging from the manufacturers of the drilling rig and its component parts, to the lessee of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lauman v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Great Western Sugar Co. v. District Court for the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fiscus v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Scordino v. Hopeman Bros., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Porter v. Beloit Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987
- Bounds v. Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986
- Burr v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.