Legal Opinion
Burr v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. Montana
Decided June 28, 2023No. 9:23-cv-00035Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION CINDY J. BURR and MICHAEL J. CV 23-35-M-DWM BURR, Plaintiffs, OPINION VS. and ORDER JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., ETHICON, LLC, KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, JOHN/JANE DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, Defendants. In 2009, Cindy Burr sought medical treatment for symptomatic cystocele. (Doc. 3 at { 14.) She subsequently underwent a number of procedures at Kalispell Regional Healthcare, including the implantation of a Gynemesh soft pelvic mesh product. (Ud. JJ 14-15.) After she began to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.