Legal Opinion
Fiscus v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1987No. 87-47PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
This appeal is from an order granting Atlantic Richfield Company’s Rule 12(b)(6), W.R.C.P. motion to dismiss appellants’ second complaint.
We reverse.
The issues presented for our determination are, as stated by appellants:
“I. Whether two separate and distinct corporate entities are entitled to constitutional and statutory immunity under Wyoming’s worker’s compensation laws?
“II. Did appellants’ complaint adequately state a cause of action against Atlantic Richfield for breach of an independent duty of care to the appellants?”
Appellant, Sharon Fiscus, was injured while employed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jones v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Ogle v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Osborn v. Emporium VideosWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Wessel v. Mapco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Fiscus v. Atlantic RichfieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.