Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERY
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, J.
The main issue presented in this appeal is the liability (other than under workers’ compensation) of an employer to his employee for injuries incurred in the course of employment in the use of a product which is also manufactured and sold to the public by the employer.
Appellants, employees of respondent, filed separate identical complaints against E. Gallo, J. Gallo, J. P. Jones and Does I through L for personal injuries suffered when the scaffolding on which they were working collapsed. Respondent was subsequently served as Doe XXI. Each complaint (insofar as respondent was…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.