Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.*
Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for retroactive correction of a child-care award. The district court also denied the merit in appellant’s request for redetermination of his basic support obligation, based on his non-overnight parenting time. Because the governing statute provides that child-care support must be based on expenses actually incurred and permits retroactive correction of a child-care support obligation to the date child-care expenses decreased, we reverse and remand for further consideration of father’s claim on that issue. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Occhino v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Brodsky v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng FuCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014