Legal Opinion

Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2012No. A11-1627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for retroactive correction of a child-care award. The district court also denied the merit in appellant’s request for redetermination of his basic support obligation, based on his non-overnight parenting time. Because the governing statute provides that child-care support must be based on expenses actually incurred and permits retroactive correction of a child-care support obligation to the date child-care expenses decreased, we reverse and remand for further consideration of father’s claim on that issue. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Occhino v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Brodsky v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng FuCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API