Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. Brodsky

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2007No. A06-736PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

This appeal involves appellant Joseph Brodsky’s challenges to the district court’s rulings on respondent Elizabeth Soil Brod-sky’s attempts to enforce a 1997 dissolution judgment. In particular, appellant challenges the grant of conduct-based attorney fees to respondent for amounts she incurred during enforcement proceedings that were ancillary to the dissolution. Appellant also challenges the grant of prejudgment interest to respondent on the amount she paid in partial satisfaction of one of appellant’s nonmarital debts.

Because the record shows that the ancillary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Marriage of Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Sharp v. BilbroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. EmmausCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. County of Grant v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Marriage of Jones v. JarvinenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Beverly Alto v. Kenneth AltoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API