Legal Opinion
Marriage of Gully v. Gully
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1999No. C6-97-2277PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Benita Fjerstad, formerly Benita A. Gully, asks us to reverse a decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals and reinstate a district court order directing her ex-husband, Edward R. Gully, Jr., to pay $28,335.28 in retroactive child support and $1,500 in attorney fees. Fjerstad contends that the district court’s order retroactively modifying Gully’s child support obligation was proper under the provision of Minn. Stat. § 518.64, subd. 2(d)(1) (1998), governing retroactive modification of child support orders. She asserts that the district court properly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Heidbreder v. CartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.