Legal Opinion
Jack v. Hood
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1928No. 158PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to quiet title to 120 acres of land, allotted to him as his surplus allotment as a member of the Creek Tribe of Indians. The bill of complaint alleges that the plaintiff was enrolled as a 2%2 Indian by blood opposite roll No. 2733; that the enrollment of the plaintiff by the Dawes Commission of the degree 2%2 Indian blood was due to a mistake in computation, as the plaintiff was the son of Csesar Jack, a full-blood Creek Indian, and of Sallie Knowles Scott, the wife of Csesar Jack, full-blood Creek Indian; that in truth and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Yarbrough v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bell v. CookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morgan v. Vandevers Dry Goods CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- (HC) Iseli v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Ruiz v. HubbardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Branden Willie Iseli v. People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Murphy Esq. Sr. v. U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021