Legal Opinion

Good v. First Nat. Bank of Roff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1923No. 10854PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.

Lillie Good, nee Morris, Lena Dawson, nee Morris, J. W. Morris, and J. D. Morris, plaintiffs, instituted this action in the dstrict court of Pontotoc county on the 2nd day of February, 1918, against the First National Bank of Roff, Okla., et al., defendants, to recover possession of 45 acres of land located near the town of Roff, Pontotoc county, Okla., and for the cancellation of certain mortgages and judgment of record affecting the title to said land.

The petition filed by the plaintiffs pleaded two causes of action. The first cause was in ■ ejectment. The second cause of action was in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Faulkner v. KirkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Metal Door & Trim Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Crowther v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API