Legal Opinion
Bell v. Cook
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma
Decided October 28, 1911No. 1,488PublishedCited by 20 opinions
At Law. Action in the nature of ejectment by Sarah R. Bell against I. C. Cook and W. A. Cook, her husband. Trial without jury.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
This is an action in the nature of ejectment brought by the plaintiff to recover from defendants the possession of a tract of land described in the petition, as follows:
“All of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter, and the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter, and lots five (5) and six (6) section *599two (21 township nineteen (19) north, range thirteen (13) east, and lot five (5) section twenty-nine (29), township eighteen (18) north, range thirteen (13) east, containing one hundred and fifty-eight and ninety-four hundredths acres, more or less.”
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hall v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Phillips v. ByrdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Yarbrough v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Grissom v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Langford v. NewsomTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.