Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
We differ with the Circuit' Court of Appeals in its' holding that, as brought in review before it, this cause was an action at law. We think the cause was then equitable and the proper review was by appeal. The case began as an action at law for money had and received. When the defendant bank claimed to be only a stakeholder of the deposit, disclaimed interest therein and offered to pay it into court, and asked that the other claimants of the fund be made parties, its answer and cross petition became an equitable defense and a prayer for affirmative equitable relief in the nature of a bill…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Camp v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Gibson v. GoldthwaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- United States ex rel. Morris v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by162 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Perttu v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.