Legal Opinion

(PC) Ruiz v. Hubbard

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02350Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-2350 JAM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 A. HUBBARD, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Rogelio May Ruiz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights 18 complaint, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a request for appointment of counsel. 19 This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). For the reasons that follow, this court finds…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Dean HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Jack v. HoodDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API