Legal Opinion
Murphy Esq. Sr. v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 15, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00870Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., doing Case No. 1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG business as SHEETMETAL & 12 ASSOCIATES, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 13 Plaintiff, (ECF No. 7) 14 v. 15 U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TAXPAYER ADVOCATE, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 16 OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND Defendant. RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED ON 17 AUGUST 24, 2021, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 18 (ECF Nos. 4, 5) 19 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 20 21 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF 22 COURT TO SERVE PLAINTIFF WITH A COPY OF THE JULY 9, 2021…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Adir International, LLC v. Starr Indemnity & Liability CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Jack v. HoodDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928