Legal Opinion

Long v. . Trantham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1946PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Decision on this appeal requires consideration only of plaintiff's exception to the judgment as of nonsuit entered in the trial court. This exception is pivoted on the question as -to whether Dilling-ham and Bagwell were equitably estopped by the petition and judgment in the cartway proceedings from thereafter asserting that their co-petitioner L. Y. Long was not entitled to cross their land on the old road to get to the land of Trantham, over which clearly the Board of Commissioners laid off and established cartway. They are precluded if their conduct would make such assertion obviously…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Thomas v. ConyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Dillingham v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API