Thomas v. Conyers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The adjudication that the deeds deposited in the bank are .void accords with the contention of the plaintiffs, and the defendants did not appeal. Furthermore, the adjudication is amply supported by former decisions of this Court. Tarlton v. Griggs, 131 N. C., 216; Perry v. Hackney, 142 N. C., 368; Booth v. Hairston, 193 N. C., 278. But the decisive question is whether in this situation the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief they seek. They are not, if in contemplation of law they are precluded from claiming title to the tracts or lots of land which are in possession of the other parties;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Booth v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Tarlton v. Griggs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Perry v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re the Will of CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Long v. . TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Yancey v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Hardy v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.