Legal Opinion

Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2007No. 396PA06PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.

This case arises from proceedings before the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“Commission”) and raises the two issues of (1) whether a party may be equitably estopped, in the absence of bad faith, from raising the two year filing requirement in N.C.G.S § 97-24 as an affirmative defense, and (2) whether the Commission’s Opinion and Award is supported by competent evidence. We granted discretionary review under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31. and now answer both questions in the affirmative. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Factual Background

Evidence before the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. CHERRY HOSPITALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Meares v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Freeman v. RothrockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Raper v. Mansfield Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API