Legal Opinion

Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1974No. 59PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant contends that when equitable reformation of an insurance policy “expands” the coverage, equity requires the insured to pay the proper premium for the additional coverage. Two policies were reformed in this case by eliminating endorsement “Auto 1145” which restricted territorial coverage on plaintiff’s buses to a 50-mile radius of Gastonia for some buses and a 150-mile radius for others. Defendant claims additional premiums of $816.00 on policy No. 2-3895407 (1969-70) and $4,007.00 on policy No. 2-3953208 (1970-71). We allowed certiorari for the limited purpose of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Davidson v. Knauff Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API