State Highway Commission v. Thornton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The Highway Commission contends that its action in improving and enlarging the old roadway, 30 feet in width, was an acceptance of the defendants’ dedication of this strip of their land to the use of the public as a road. If so, the defendants, as to this part of their land, would be entitled neither to injunctive relief nor to compensation. However, the superior court concluded that the defendants had made no such dedication. This conclusion is supported by the court’s findings of fact, which, in turn, are supported by the evidence.
In Nicholas v. Furniture Co., 248 N.C. 462, 103 S.E. 2d 837,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Blackwelder v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.