In Re Young
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The appropriateness of habeas corpus to determine the present rightful custody of Jo Anna Young is challenged on two grounds :
First, because the petitioners have shown no authority to make the application on behalf of Hall Young.
Secondly, even if such authority exists, Hall Young himself would he estopped by the divorce proceeding in Virginia to assert his fatherhood of Jo Anna Young, a necessary averment to support the writ.
It is provided by C. S'., 2241, that habeas corpus may be used to decide a contest “between any husband and wife, who are living in a state of separation, without being…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
- Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Crawford v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- In Re Samuel ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Long v. . TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Phipps v. . VannoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re RenfrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In Re the Custody of McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954