Legal Opinion
Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 2008No. 07CA2049PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this eminent domain action, respondents, San Miguel Valley Corporation; Boomerang Holdings, LLC; Alley Oop Holdings, LLC; and Cordillera Corporation (col lectively, Landowners), appeal the trial court's order granting them a partial award of attorney fees against petitioner, the Town of Telluride. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding the attorney fees and costs that Landowners incurred in challenging Telluride's authority to condemn Landowners' property were not recoverable under section 38-1-122(1.5), C.R.S.2008. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. RevenigColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Morris v. Askeland Enterprises, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Donald C. Taylor and Margaret Ann Taylor TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Airth v. Zurich American Insurance CoColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Sinclair Marketing Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- City of Colorado Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Idowu v. NesbittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.