Legal Opinion

Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 2002No. 00SA233PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. Introduction

In this appeal, we address whether rates charged for a prepaid telecommunications plan, the NOW Plan, offered by NOW Communications, Inc., violate Colorado's statutory rate cap for residential telephone service. The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approved NOW's rates and granted a certificate of public convenience and necessity to NOW Communications, Inc. to provide residential basic local telephone exchange service. The district court affirmed the PUC's order.

Both the PUC and the district court held that the monthly and non-recurring charges for NOW Communication's prepaid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bill Boom Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. City of Montrose v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. Interest of A.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. People Ex Rel. J.R.T. v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Concerned Parents of Pueblo, Inc. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Pediatric Neurosurgery, P.C. v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. Eddie's Leaf Spring Shop & Towing, LLC v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API