Legal Opinion

United States v. Bodcaw Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 16, 1979No. 78-551PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States brought this condemnation action to acquire a permanent easement in land owned by the respondent. The jury determined that just compensation for the easement was $146,206, a sum about halfway between the Government’s offer and the respondent’s claim. The District Court granted the respondent’s motion to increase the award by $20,512.60 to compensate it for the expenses of securing appraisals of the land and for the fees of expert witnesses. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the award in part, holding that the appraisal fees in this case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API