United States v. Bodcaw Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The United States brought this condemnation action to acquire a permanent easement in land owned by the respondent. The jury determined that just compensation for the easement was $146,206, a sum about halfway between the Government’s offer and the respondent’s claim. The District Court granted the respondent’s motion to increase the award by $20,512.60 to compensate it for the expenses of securing appraisals of the land and for the fees of expert witnesses. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the award in part, holding that the appraisal fees in this case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.