Legal Opinion

Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 2, 2008No. 07SA101PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

This appeal raises the question whether section 38-1-101(4)(b), C.R.S. (2007) ("subsection 4b"), unconstitutionally denies home rule municipalities their eminent domain power under article XX of the Colorado Constitution. The Town of Telluride, a home rule municipality, sought to condemn 572 acres of real property located adjacent to Telluride for open space and park purposes. The owners of the property contested the condemnation, asserting that Telluride was barred from condemning the property by subsection 4b, which prohibits home rule municipalities from condemning property outside…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. District Court for County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Four-County Metropolitan Capital Improvement District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colorado Mining Ass'n v. Board of County Commissioners of Summit CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  3. Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. City of Lafayette v. Town of ErieColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. 211 Eighth, LLC v. Town of CarbondaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API