Legal Opinion

City of Colorado Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLP

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2010No. 09CA1467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge LICHTENSTEIN.

In this eminent domain proceeding, petitioner, the City of Colorado Springs, appeals the trial court's order awarding attorney fees to respondent, Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLP, pursuant to section 88-1-122(1.5), C.R.S.2009. We reverse the order.

Under section 388-1~122(1.5), property owners are entitled to reimbursement for attorney fees they incur in challenging the governmental entity's valuation of their condemned property if the court's award exceeds the condemning entity's last written offer by thirty percent:

[IJn addition to any compensation awarded to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kane v. Town of Estes ParkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. HayutinColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Palizzi v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF SAN MIGUEL v. RobertsColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Morris v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API