Legal Opinion
E-470 Public Highway Authority v. Revenig
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 2006No. 04CA2396PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
In this eminent domain proceeding, respondents, Steven J. Revenig and Howard Farkas (landowners), appeal the trial court’s order denying them attorney fees and costs incurred in challenging on appeal the constitutionality of § 38 — 1—114(2)(d), C.R.S.2005 (reducing monetary award of compensation for land taken by the value of special benefits added to landowners’ remaining property by virtue of the condemnation). We affirm.
Petitioner, E-470 Public Highway Authority, offered landowners $100 for fee and easement rights in seventy-three acres of land to be used in connection with E-470’s highway…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. RevenigSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Jagow v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. JagowColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Freedom Colorado Information, Inc. v. El Paso County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Churchill v. University of Colorado at BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. RheaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lees v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.