Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 23, 1999No. C0-98-1734PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Petitioners invoke our declaratory power under Minn.Stat. § 14.44 (1998) to determine whether Minn. R. 5220.1900, subpts. lb and lc (1993), which freezes and caps the hourly rates of qualified rehabilitation consultants, violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the Minnesota and United States Constitutions.
FACTS
In 1992, in response to the rising costs of rehabilitative services, the Minnesota legislature directed the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry (the department) to establish a fee schedule or to limit fees charged by qualified rehabilitation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.